Based from the sixth chapter of
the eighth book of St. Augustine’s “City of God”, it shows that Philosophy is intellectual
transcendence from the sensible to the intelligible. This is shown in St.
Augustine’s discussion of the Platonist philosophy, in the topic of the
“physical”.
In the sixth
chapter, St. Augustine brings out the significance of the Platonists in
relation to the topic in Philosophy concerning the “physical”. The “physical”, in the Greek sense, involved
the notion of “change”. This has been
the study of the early Greek thinkers, and the Platonists were not exempted
from considering this problem in their philosophizing, especially in the topic
about finding the causes of all things. While some philosophers attributed this
“cause” to something that is material (e.g. Pre-Socratics, Stoics, etc.) the
Platonists, as Gyula Klima described in his book Medieval Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary, stated
that they have seen that no material body can be this “cause of all things” 1.
It is because of
this shift of thought from materiality (something sensible) to immateriality (something intelligible) that St. Augustine
sees the significance of the Platonists. This significance implies the idea
that a “cause” cannot be attributed to something which is material. This is because attributing a “material cause”
as the cause of all things exclusively puts off the realm of the intelligible. The reality that one experiences with change
connects him to something beyond that change. If done, this leads to
inconsistency or error or even absurdity by attributing the cause of all things
as material.
St. Augustine
points to the physical or natural in order to establish the reality of change
and connect it to the manifestations of something intelligible through sensible
things. All sensible things change. This change provides the principle of the
intelligible by which something beyond what can be seen and touched or
experienced can be understood. Through
the physical or natural that changes, one can realize that which never changes.
But that which never changes cannot be
totally comprehended. Only in the
specter of the sensible and the intelligible that the divine is revealed.
St. Augustine took
this important contribution of the Platonists in relation to theology. This is
because the Platonic idea concerning an “immaterial cause” is a crucial aspect
in a Christian’s pursuit in understanding the nature of God, especially on the
topic about His existence and the existence of everything. This is observed to be plausible, for understanding
the nature of God requires more than empirical knowledge. In a Christian’s philosophical pursuit about
God, then, it is more beneficial to embrace the Platonic idea of an “immaterial
cause” to be able to achieve that clarity and enlightenment that is required in
contemplating on that which is divine.
Another
point in which St. Augustine gives importance to the Platonists is that they contributed
a great deal in the natural or “physical” part of theology. This contribution revolves around the idea of
using the concept of an “immaterial cause” as a basis for the nature of God. This
“physical” part has the same concern in the “physical” in Philosophy: it is
about the “cause of all things”, only this time it involves the idea of God. This contribution is presented by St.
Augustine in his statement that the existence of every changeable (“physical”)
thing in this world is made possible because there is an unchangeable cause for
it, which he attributes to God. This is
seen in his statement, according to Gyula Klima’s book Medieval Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary, which says
that the existence of everything is only possible through God because He truly is;
that He is unchangeable 2.
In relation to this idea, St.
Augustine gives numerous examples, such as the life of trees and man in which
he surmised could only be possible through God, because He is the only thing
which is unchangeable and absolute. In other words, the contribution of the
Platonists in the “physical” part of theology is that it provided a foundation
for the idea of creation of things, which can be observed as an essential
aspect in understanding the nature of God, the Creator.
Philosophy,
then, is transcending the depth of material or sensible and finds the
immaterial or the intelligible in the process.
In the pursuit of wisdom, one should see beyond the empirical evidences
and finds truths in them. He must push
through these empirical evidences to really be enlightened and be able to
transcend and realize that there is a cause of all things.
When one connects the
sensible to the intelligible, only then that he can find truth. This path allows one to contemplate beyond,
in order to realize the core of every reality in the physical or natural
realm. Just as how the classic Platonic allegory
of the cave goes, one must not limit himself into the empirical evidences that
he has because it is still not the fullest form of wisdom. True wisdom, therefore, can only be attained
when one contemplates deeper and liberate himself from these partial knowledge
through empirical evidence. It is only
when one sees beyond the things around him that he can truly be enlightened.
Concerning the meaning of the Platonists in
this particular matter, St. Augustine points out the ability of one to embrace
the opportunity of understanding the meaning of change through the sensible and
intelligible things. Only when one sees
beyond the senses that he can find truth in intelligible things. This is necessary to understand the nature of
God.
Therefore, there is cause in all things that
change. But such cause is not something
that changes. It is is and neither sensible nor intelligible. But that is manifests itself in both the sensible
and the intelligible. Such cause is
Uncaused and, therefore, Unchangeable. Such
Uncaused and Unchangeable Cause is God, the foundation of all things that exist
or the primordial principle from which every reality springs.
Sources:
1. Gyula Klima, “Augustine on Ancient Philosophy”,
(USA: Blackwell Publications), In Medieval
Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary, 36.
2. Ibid.
No comments:
Post a Comment